There was an article in the Shanghai English Language paper recently about defective products being sold in Shanghai stores. Apparently about 40% of the apparel sold in Shanghai area dept stores reveals defects, everything from excessive formaldehyde to misleading labels. A sweater, for example, was described as 100% wool but it turned out to have only about 20% wool content. The same old China song and dance in other words. Still I was a bit surprised to read this kind of story because over the years the quality of product made in China has gotten much better as overseas importers have imposed stricter requirements on their Chinese suppliers and as a growing and more affluent Chinese middle class has come to demand higher quality from domestic vendors. The story illustrates however that the Made in China brand is still plagued by the quality problems that have been associated with Chinese products over the last 30 years. In other words you can never take your guard down when you manufacture in China. You still have to test your products at regular intervals and make sure your vendor knows your standards and is maintaining quality and safety standards. Here is the link to the article
I had an inquiry today from someone who wants to move their CPG ( Consumer Packaged Good) production from the US to China. They want to ship CIF which stands for Cost Insurance and Freight. In a CIF transaction the supplier/exporter is responsible for assigning a carrier/vessel and insuring the cargo. Once the vessel lands at the destination port the buyer/importer takes possession. The main advantage to doing a China order CIF, as opposed to FOB ( Free on Board) is that the supplier handles all the shipping arrangements for you. You simply have to pick up the cargo when it arrives and arrange for transportation to your warehouse. In theory CIF reduces the work load on the importer and may seem like the ideal arrangement for a first time importer who has no experience with international shipping, which can be quite complicated. The downside to CIF however is considerable. Your product will cost more because you are asking your supplier to bear more responsibility and not surprisingly most suppliers will look at a CIF proposal as an opportunity to pad their margins. In addition, you lose transparency on the real cost of your product. The real cost of your product is what it costs to make and package your product. Not what it costs to ship your product ( which is landed cost and which varies depending on a number of factors). You will also have no control over shipping. If yours is not a time-sensitive order then CIF might be OK. But if you need your product shipped on a timely basis, to fulfill orders, you will be taking a big risk because you will have no control over transit times and carriers. In fact, your supplier may not choose the best carrier but the carrier who offers them the most preferential terms. Your supplier will act in their best interests, not yours.
With an FOB order, on the other hand, the importer, working with a Logistics company, has complete control over shipping. If problems arise you can work quickly with the carrier directly to resolve them. The downside to FOB is that, yes, you need a Shipping or Logistics Company to help you arrange shipping. This is of course another cost, one of the hidden costs to overseas sourcing. But you have to look at it as one of the necessary costs and you should be prepared to bear it.
In the end your expenditure will probably be the same, whether you allow your supplier to arrange shipping, resulting in a higher unit cost for your product, or whether you enlist the help of a Logistics company to help you arrange shipping and handle documentation. It is when problems arise that you are far better off with your own shipping agent as opposed to trying to resolve problems with an anonymous shipping company that has been selected by your supplier.
I had an email from a former client this past week. She is the founder of a company that makes a popular line of kids bags and she is looking for new factories in China. She had a strategy question for me as follows:
“I am sending samples for pricing from a factory that came highly recommended and of course they are asking how many SKUs etc. I have not actually revealed my brand as yet because I don’t want them to base their pricing by looking at our website prices. Do you think that this is wise? Or should I send them our catalog so they can see all of our SKUs and then give them target pricing ? Which do you think is a better strategy? “
This is a good question and I replied to her as follows:
“It is always a fine line to tread between being paranoid about things and being careful.
I personally never recommend revealing your brand until it is absolutely necessary and I usually advise people to have mock ups without branding to submit to prospective vendors. But if you feel they may know who you are already since you have been communicating with them or because you came recommended from someone else who has used them, then it is probably not a good idea to try to conceal who you are.
But this leads me to a good point and that is that I think it is a good idea to have some mock ups made up from your current vendor so that in the future you can approach prospective vendors without revealing your company and retail pricing. First costs from new vendors are important because those costs serve as the basis for your first few orders. If they are high to begin with then when your vendor starts raising costs on your 2nd or 3rd orders ( as often happens) you may be priced out of doing business with them quickly. If on the other hand you can negotiate a low first cost to begin with then even when the cost goes up you may still be able to hit your margins while you fulfill orders and look for a new vendor. Making sure your vendor does not know your retail pricing goes a long way in keeping your first costs low. And mock-ups will help you achieve this.”
I had an email from a Chinese testing lab the other day that outlines all the testing requirements for Toys sold in the US. I thought it was a pretty good summary of where you need to be as far as product testing goes depending on your product and so I thought I would post it here this week (edited and posted below). Just an FYI, under the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 all toys sold in the US must comply with certain product safety regulations. The section of the Act that covers toys is known as ASTM F963. ( American Society for Testing and Materials) If you are reaching out to Chinese manufacturers with a toy design make sure you know the testing requirements for your product and pass these on to your prospective supplier.
After reading the list below to see where your product falls, you should spend some time on the ASTM website ASTM website to read more about the safety standards and see what you need to do to get your product in compliance. Testing labs in China also know the standards ( since they are the ones testing the products) but it is a good idea to make 100% sure you know as much as they do and that you neither overlook something you need to test for nor have superfluous and costly tests done.
Here is the overview:
ASTM F 963-11 Requirements
When you certify in a written Children’s Product Certificate that a product meets ASTM F 963-11, you must include the specific sections to which you are certifying compliance.
Also, toys may be subject to regulations enacted under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA), such as requirements for small parts, pacifiers, rattles, etc., many of which are cited below. Check the list of products requiring third-party testing and regulated products to ensure that you are in compliance with all applicable regulations. Yes indicates the product must undergo testing; No means testing is not required.
Group 1: Sections Applicable to Most Toys
As mentioned above, the following requirements must be met for most toys. All toy manufacturers should review these sections to ensure that their products are in compliance.
Section Title Requires Testing at a CPSC-Accepted Laboratory
188.8.131.52 Heavy Elements: Paint and Similar Surface Coating Materials Yes
184.108.40.206 Heavy Elements: Substrate Materials (Note: Many toys intended for children under 6 and all toys intended to be mouthed or contact food and drink are subject to this requirement. See the standard for more.) Yes
220.127.116.11 Cleanliness of Liquids, Pastes, Putties, Gels, and Powders Yes
(Except for cosmetics and tests on formulations used to prevent microbial degradation.)
4.6 Small Objects Yes
(Except no third party testing is required for labeling and/or instructional literature requirements)
4.7 Accessible Edges Yes
(Except no third party testing is required for labeling and/or instructional literature requirements)
4.9 Accessible Points Yes
(Except no third party testing is required for labeling and/or instructional literature requirements)
5 (Entire Section) Safety Labeling Requirements No
6 (Entire Section) Instructional Literature No
7 (Entire Section) Producer’s Markings No
Group 2: Sections Applicable to Specific Types of Toys
The following set of requirements is for specific types of toys or toys with specific attributes. All toy manufacturers should review these sections to ensure that their products are in compliance.
Section Title Requires Testing at a CPSC-Accepted Laboratory
4.1 Material Quality No
4.2 Flammability Excluded by CPSIA No
4.4 Electrical/Thermal Energy** Electrical Toys. See 16 CFR 1505.
Yes, to 16 CFR 1505
4.5 Sound-Producing Toys Acoustic Toys Yes
4.8 Projections Sharp Points Yes
4.10 Wires & Rods Sharp Points Yes
4.11 Nails & Fasteners Sharp Points Yes
4.12 Plastic Film Yes
4.13 Folding Mechanisms & Hinges Enclosed/Hinged Toys Yes
4.14 Cords & Elastics in Toys Corded/Elastic toys Yes
4.15 Stability & Overload Requirements Ride-On Toys and Toy Seats Yes
4.16 Confined Spaces Enclosed/Hinged Toys Yes
4.17 Wheels, Tires, & Axles Yes
4.18 Holes, Clearance, & Accessibility of Mechanisms Enclosed/Hinged Toys Yes
4.19 Simulated Protective Devices Yes
4.20 Pacifiers Yes
4.21 Projectile Toys Projectiles Yes
4.22 Teethers & Teething Toys Yes
4.23 Rattles Yes
4.24 Squeeze Toys Non-Rigid Toys Yes
4.25 Battery-Operated Toys Yes
4.26 Toys Intended to Be Attached to a Crib or Playpen Infant toys Yes
4.27 Toy Chests (ASTM F 963-07e1) Enclosed/Hinged Toys Yes
4.27 Stuffed & Bean Bag-Type Toys Non-Rigid Toys Yes
4.28 Stroller and Carriage Toys Labeling requirements only No
4.30 Toy Gun Marking Projectiles Yes
4.31 Balloons No. Label in accordance with 16 CFR 1500.19 and 16 CFR 1500.20.
4.32 Certain toys with Nearly Spherical Ends* Spherical toys Yes
4.33 Marbles Spherical toys. No. Label in accordance with 16 CFR 1500.19 and 16 CFR 1500.20.
4.34 Balls Spherical toys. No. Label in accordance with 16 CFR 1500.19 and 16 CFR 1500.20.
4.35 Pom Poms Non-Rigid Toys Yes
4.36 Hemispherical-Shaped Objects Spherical toys Yes
4.37 Yo-Yo Elastic Tether Toys Corded/Elastic toys Yes
4.38 Magnets Magnets Yes
4.39 Jaw Entrapment in Handles and Steering Wheels Yes
4.29 Art Materials (16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8))
Yes, to 15 USC 1278a(Total Lead Content).
4.3.7 Stuffing Materials Yes. Stuffed toys with all new stuffing must meet 4.1, no testing at CPSC-accepted laboratory required to this section.
I was reading another sourcing blog this morning and author, Mr. A. whom I know and respect, was talking about how to deal with rising costs from your suppliers in China, what every importer grapples with sooner or later. His solutions were as follows ( with my response in in italics) :
- Sell a product with higher margins
Disagree. I don’t think one can just switch products like this. I would say most small companies or start ups have unique products that they have spent time developing (the reason they have gone into business in the first place). They are married to their designs and they simply cannot jettison them.
- Smart product design
Somewhat agree. This is the importance of working with a good supplier. A good supplier will help you to look at and improve your product to hit target costs. But at the same time this is easier said than done because some product changes result in less than expected cost savings. And unless you have significant order QTYs you are probably not going to see substantial savings.
- Remove excessive packaging
Disagree. Packaging is so important and unfortunately can be a major cost. In fact, I would prefer to err on the side of having more packaging than not enough packaging which can lead to damages in transit.
- Produce in other countries
Disagree. I have talked to many companies who produce in other countries. Apparently countries like Vietnam, Mexico, Indonesia are no better than China. And in many cases e.g. Mexico they are worse.
- Pay your suppliers in their own currency
Disagree. This involves more hassle than it is probably worth and many vendors want the USD. I would add that the costs of setting up a foreign bank account, what you need to do in order to pay vendors in their own currency, will probably offset any savings you will get.
If Mr. A, whom as I said I respect, cannot come up with a good solution about how to deal with rising costs in China and in other countries, then there probably are no solutions.
But # 1 on the above list got me to thinking. If you can’t change your product, and I really don’t think you can, maybe you can change your customers. In other words, let’s say instead of trying to sell at Wal-Mart, you simply focused on selling on your own website and on Amazon Marketplace, for example. This is known as multi-channel eCommerce selling. Of course your orders would be smaller but your margins would be greater. And you would not have to be overly concerned about rising costs, shipping deadlines, inspections etc etc. In fact, I think your only concern would be meeting MOQs.
A case in point. I visited a local company last week. They were established 15 years ago and seem to be doing quite well. They do mostly online sales ( a children’s product) and have several hundred independent brick and mortar accounts nationwide. I got the feeling from my visit that business is good and the owners of the company are already planning years ahead for their brand. And as I was heading back to the car I thought back to a discussion I had with one of my former clients last month who told me that after years of targeting big box retailers, where he has sold with some success, he was going to scale down and focus more on sales from his own website. He told me he has burned out with Wal-Mart where sales in some stores are great and in other stores not so great. And not only does one have to tackle fickle consumer demand but they also face compliance guidelines, delayed payouts, chargebacks and imperious buyers. I have worked on many of these big-box programs and they are a headache. Pure and simple.
However, the icing on the cake is a blog post from a former retail buyer that I came across yesterday. She says that accepting an order from a big box retailer can actually be a strike against you with that same retailer. If you are considering doing orders a big retailer then read this first.A Buyer’s perspective
I don’t take on a lot of apparel projects even though I get inquires from small apparel companies a few times a month. The reason is that I don’t have a lot of experience with apparel and it is outside my comfort zone. A few years ago I somewhat reluctantly agreed to do an apparel inspection in China for a company I know. I found it very challenging simply because I did not have a lot of experience in garment sewing, which is very different and far more complex than home textiles sewing, where I do have a lot of experience. In fact I spent a few years in Home Textiles production in China and in that time I learned how difficult textile production can be, from achieving the right colors on fabrics to the intricacies of CMT ( Cut, Manufacture and Trim). But even my experience in home textiles did not prepare me for the severity of inspecting a 30,000 pc apparel order in China. Just the notion of stitch geometry or the myriad handling strategies when sewing a garment depending on the shape of the fabric is enough to scare one off.
Yet, even though I don’t generally take on apparel products I do know some basic things you need to consider when you are sourcing apparel in China. And these are the things so few people include when they approach me with a project request: Accordingly here they are:
- Pantones for all fabrics, logos etc. Pantone books are very expensive but if you are sourcing apparel overseas having a Pantone book is indispensible. And the best Panton book ( and there are many) are those with multiple pantone chips of the same color – so you can send a vendor one pantone and have extras for yourself. Do not think your project will go well if you don’t provide your vendor with a specific pantone.
- Sizing in CM, find a sizing chart online showing differences between US/European and Chinese. Don’t just assume that your vendor knows US sizing charts because they have manufactured for US customers before. You would be surprised at the stories I hear e.g. medium sized garments coming in from China that fit like XS here in the US.
- What kind of fabric you need. Be very specific here. Type of fabric e.g. if cotton what kind of cotton. Is it Gingham, Flannelette, Pima etc etc ; Weight. Usually measured as the weight per one meter of fabric/weave g. plain, satin, twill etc etc etc. It is not to be expected that you will know all this info off the top of your head but you need to know it. The best way is to go down to your local fabric store and ask them to tell you what the fabric is. And then go to another fabric store to double check the info you have been given.
- Detailed patterns done on CAD. Check with the vendor to see which format they need CAD in. There are several formats.
- Components (if applicable) buttons, zippers etc. Specify these as best you can. The more info you give your vendor, the cheaper your cost will likely be. Not only does it project to the vendor your knowledge of your own product but it decreases the likelihood that they will source a more expensive component for you than you actually need.
- Labeling requirements. These are important and will impact cost. You need to include all fonts.
- Testing requirements. Never to be overlooked with any product and essential for any apparel product being imported from China.
Be prepared to have to meet MOQs per design/color and even size. The reason is that the factories that sew your garments are are ordering fabric from 3rd party suppliers. The CMT factories do not make their own fabric and therefore they face MOQs as well from their own fabric suppliers. I see so many people who have a new apparel line and they want to have as many SKUS as possible because it makes their line more attractive. But they don’t understand where factories in China get their own fabric and that there are very stiff MOQs for fabric. So you have to always think the fewer SKUs the better. At least when you are starting out.
Finally, make sure you have plenty of fabric on-hand so you can send prospective vendors fabric swatches. There is no substitute for providing the vendor with an actual sample of the exact type of fabric you want to work with. And, once again, the fabric store is the best place to go.
I sat down yesterday with a local entrepreneur. He owns a chemical products company that he established ten years ago and the company has grown from 5 to 10 employees over the last year. He wanted to talk to me about China or, more aptly put, he wanted to complain about China. He detailed for me some of the challenges he has faced there over the last ten years. Among the things he told me:
- He hired a Chinese employee only to have that employ take his formulas and set up his own company in China. And then this ex-employee had the gall to approach his former boss and offer to be a supplier. Because the prices were good the American could not resist and he is now buying his own product from someone who stole that product from him! I have heard these outrageous but true stories so many times before. There is no way to avoid situations like this but by making sure you vett the people you are employing as thoroughly as possible. I should have asked about his hiring process but I didn’t. But a good tip is this if you are protective of your IP you should never hire anyone but a US citizen or permanent resident who can be held accountable under terms of an NDA.
- As a side venture the entrepreneur tried to export California wine to China, under private label, only to find that he had to register his designs with the Chinese govt. and was forced to have a Joint Venture (JV) partner. He seemed to think this was just opening the door to getting ripped off again. Of course it is. But as I explained to him if you are making a good profit off of China, it shouldn’t bother you if your JV partner in China is making a good profit off of you.
- He attempted to learn Chinese believing that it is very important to speak the language of the country where you are doing business. I couldn’t agree more. He mentioned what a hard language it was to learn. But he said that he was forced to give up his studies when the SARS epidemic broke out, believing that he would not be able to spend time in China to practice. I don’t know what to say here but it does not sound like he made a sustained effort. And that is what it takes to learn Chinese, a sustained effort. It is a hard language. He is correct.
- He wanted to know how I had avoided becoming jaded when dealing with China over the years. I told him about George Kates, an American antiquarian who lived in China in the 1930s and wrote a book about his experience entitled “The Years That Were Fat.” George Kates, The Years That Were Fat Kates spent seven years in China and he said that in order to live in China the one thing that is most important is patience. So, yes, patience is the most important thing when you do business in China. Another key to succeeding in China is that you have to like China. If you don’t like China, don’t like the food, the people, the history or culture, it is probably not a place you should locate your business. You will get jaded quickly as I sense he has.
I had an email the other day from a Chinese sourcing agent who is based in Hong Kong, Chris Lo. Chris said he enjoyed my blog and wanted to offer a few useful observations about sourcing in China from the perspective of an on-the-ground local Hong Kong sourcing manager. Accordingly, here they are ( his observations in Italics ) :
- Chris writes that when you deal with suppliers in China it is always good to use a factory with Hong Kong or Taiwanese management if you can find one.
This is correct. The reason is obvious, the HK and Taiwanese managers are just more in tune with Western and Japanese business practices and they tend to manage their factories well. The only caveat is that you will probably end up paying more for your product than you would were you to use a Chinese mainland managed factory. Still, I think it is worth paying a little more to get better communication and often better quality and for this reason if you do have a choice between giving an order to a Hong Kong managed FTY or a Mainland managed FTY, you should always give the order to the Hong Kong/Taiwanese FTY even if the cost is greater.
- Chris mentions that as the Guangdong Government is trying to phase out Low Cost Manufacturing, many industries are relocating to the Eastern China, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Jiangsu i.e. The Changjiang Delta area as opposed to the Pearl River Delta area in Guangdong. He says that he has heard from other Hong Kong based sourcing agents that the MOQs are very high in these areas now, while quality tends to lag. One reason is that these are bigger FTYs and they need bigger orders to stay afloat.
That the Central Govt is trying to phase out Low Cost Manufacturing in the South of China has become something of a standard line in recent years. Nothing new here. But this is the first time I have heard about higher MOQs and lower quality coming out of suppliers in Eastern China. I think this makes sense because manufacturing around Shanghai, in places like Zhejiang and Jiangsu tends to be on a larger scale. I have been in a lot of huge textile and furniture factories there over the years, much larger than anything I have ever seen in other parts of China. So it is quite natural that these bigger FTYs need bigger orders to stay afloat. I am not sure about the quality statement. I think it depends on the industry and product. I do think that the South is still a good choice to source products because the infrastructure and product knowledge have been there for several decades whereas only in recent years has other manufacturing moved up north. Of course I would qualify this by saying that once again it depends on the product and industry.
- Chris mentions that Fujian Province is a good place to manufacture now. He says it is a very good place to send your apparel projects and that all of the big global brands have production there.
I was not aware of Fujian Province’s strength as a textile producing base. I have made 2-3 trips to Fujian Province over the last 10 years and my sense there is that prices are very low, but that quality is an issue. But these were not textile orders I was working on so I would not know. Still, I would be a little cautious sourcing in Fujian Province. It does not have the infrastructure that the low cost South has, nor the sophistication that areas feeding Shanghai have e.g. Zhejiang and Jiangsu.
Finally I would like to quote Chris verbatim for something he says about the ease of online sourcing these days:
“Doing business in China without regular checking would have a high chance going wrong (but I guess it is same for everywhere.). So to me I’d like to comment also on the emerging e-platform, I think it is just for gaining exposure for the suppliers but you cannot do industrial production without directly getting to your supplier, having face to face meeting and in-line inspection; the old fashion way of visiting industry fairs, factory visits still has place a good value for doing so. Industrial production is not talking about selling one item with simple emails and clicks.”
I like that about the “old-fashioned” way of sourcing. I agree, it is just a much safer way to go about it.
Thanks Chris !
One issue that small companies and start ups grapple with all the time when they source overseas is MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity). I don’t think a week goes by when I don’t get an inquiry from a small company that wants to source a product in China but in very small QTYs, in many cases just a few hundred units. For example, a few weeks back a London based women’s apparel start-up emailed me. They have 20 designs and want to order between 100-200 pcs per design. They want good quality and a low cost. I told them that I saw this as a very challenging project and I suggested that the only way to do this would be to reduce the number of designs and increase the order QTY per design. Only in that way could they think of meeting the fabric MOQs that vendors in China would likely be facing were they to take this order. Like many small companies that hold steadfast to their designs, this company said they didn’t want to eliminate any designs and that was the last I heard from them. I imagine they are back on alibaba looking for suppliers.
Although there are suppliers in China that will accept small orders, these are generally not reputable suppliers and if you do place an order with a vendor like this you might just be throwing away your money. The vendor makes a small profit and sends you an order you cannot sell. I have seen it happen many times.
Just out of curiosity I went online to see how other sourcing consultants handle the issue of MOQ. In other words is there any way around MOQ ? Some of the advice I saw is as follows: limit product customization; negotiate a lower MOQ; pay a higher unit cost; streamline material usage; focus on buying from small suppliers etc etc. Let’s look at these strategies:
- Simplifying product design. Conceivably, the only way this would get you around an MOQ would be if you were simplifying design to cut unit cost so you could order more of a product to meet an MOQ. It sounds good in theory but I have never in fact seen a company do this. Companies that change a design do so to lower costs, not to increase their costs. I would add that modifications to a product design, unless major, usually result in very insignificant cost reductions. But, as I said, I have never heard of a company doing this.
- Negotiate a lower MOQ. I think this only works with vendors with whom you have had a longstanding relationship. They want to maintain the relationship and therefore will sometimes waive MOQ requirements. This happens all the time. On the other hand, if you negotiate a lower MOQ with with a first time vendor, they will just seek to cut costs in your production and you may end up with goods you can’t sell. I always advise companies not to get into protracted negotiations with first time suppliers because it just sends the relationship in the wrong direction from the get-go. But OK if you are trying to get around an MOQ with a longstanding vendor. It never hurts to ask.
- Pay a higher unit cost. What you will have to do if you want to order less than the MOQ. If you have target costs this may make your project untenable. It also locks you into a higher price as your orders get bigger. Yet this is what many companies have to do to get around MOQ.
- Streamline material usage: Not realistic unless you have a product you can do this with. Most small companies don’t.
- Buy from small suppliers. Small suppliers are usually not reputable suppliers. If you have any kind of strict design requirements, you will not have success with small suppliers who simply do not have the expertise to handle challenging designs/orders.
In fact, the only thing I advise small companies to do when they are inquiring with a China vendor about MOQ is NOT to ask the vendor first what their MOQ is but instead to give the vendor 3 QTYs to quote on, one for the minimum they think they can order and then in increments accordingly. For example if I wanted to make a wooden picture frame in China I might reach out to vendors and tell them that I am interested in QTYs of 1000/2500/5000 and ask them to quote on each QTY accordingly. If the vendor really wants my business, they will quote me on my terms and will not mention their own MOQ, even though they may in fact have one. I think this is really the only way to get around MOQ. But even this strategy has its limits because many vendors will just come back to you and tell you that they have an MOQ.
In short, this is why overseas sourcing is so challenging, because no matter how cheap the unit price is, you are not going to get that unit price unless you order a far bigger QTY of product than you might be able to sell.
I had an email from a South African company last week. They were reaching out to me to help them source self-balancing electric scooters, those cool scooters you see when you walk down the street in any major American city nowadays. It just so happened that the company emailed another sourcing company at the same time and as they failed to bcc the email recipients, I could see the other company. Out of curiosity I looked at their webpage and saw that this is a Chinese sourcing company based in China. As is so typical with China based sourcing companies, this company promises that the importing process will be cheap, fast and reliable, that is as long as you use their service. The website is full of information but when you read much of it you realize it does not say much. For example there is a tab on “how to import furniture from China.” It looks promising but when you click on the tab the gist of the lengthy text is that if you want to import furniture you need to find a good supplier. And that’s all. There is nothing about the myriad of problems associated with sourcing furniture in China e.g. a factory’s drying facilities, the quality of hardware and lacquers, fumigation certificates etc etc, a few of the things that come to mind when I think about importing furniture from China. Much of the text is cast in ungrammatical language and when they advise you to watch out for scams they spell it “scums.” They say they have 6000 suppliers in their data base. It looks good but how many of these suppliers are active suppliers of theirs they do not say. I suspect very few. This is the kind of China sourcing company that often comes up when you do an online search. But it is not the kind of company I would advise someone to use.
The kind of company I would recommend using is a sourcing company that spells out clearly the risks of sourcing from China. Such a company I came across a couple of weeks ago. They are located in the Midwest and the owner is a Chinese lady who has been helping US companies source industrial products in China for 20 years now. There is a tab on the website of this company labelled “essential China advice” and it pretty much spells out the obstacles that one encounters when sourcing in China. I read through it and I think it is excellent in terms of the advice it offers e.g. anticipate mistakes before they happen so you will be in a better position to deal with them when they do happen, if in fact you cannot circumvent them with adequate foresight; Do not make assumptions about your China partners and/or China orders but be on top of everything at all times; Don’t be in the habit of taking big risks; Play by the rules in China. And much more advice along these lines. After reading this I come away thinking, wow, doing business in China is costly, challenging and there is no guarantee of success, what I knew all along, but what so many people do not know when they contact China based sourcing company and are told the process is easy. Here is the link to the company Good US based China sourcing company
In short when you are looking for a China sourcing company, don’t go with the people who tell you it will be easy. Go with the person who tells you it will be difficult and that you will need to stay the course, no matter how difficult. And that you may not always succeed. Go with the person who tells you that you will sometimes need to show up in China to meet the people who are making your product and helping you grow your business, and not those who tell you that you don’t need to go to China and that they will manage everything for you. In other words, when looking for someone to help you with you China sourcing use your common sense.